Sean Penn is in “dictator denial”

Sean Penn loves a good dictator. Don’t tell him that, or he might find a way to throw you in jail- for expressing that thought.

While on the HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher” this past Friday, Penn expressed his anger over the way Venezuelan president dictator Hugo Chavez is described by some journalists- as being a dictator.

Penn said, “Every day, this elected leader is called a dictator here, and we just accept it, and accept it. And this is mainstream media, who should — truly, there should be a bar by which one goes to prison for these kinds of lies.”

Fortunately for us, we live in the United States- we have that thing called the Bill of Rights. People like Sean Penn would be relieved if this pesky little ammendment was absent:

Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

While Sean Penn has lived a life that most people only dream about, had he been born in Cuba, where his buddies the Castro brothers imprison people for expressing ideas and views that go against “their revolution”, Penn would probably be a cigar roller or tobacco picker rather then a millionaire actor with several homes.

Penn has been a Hugo Chavez “groupie” for years too. The Venezuelan dictator is a preacher of Marxism- he’s a Socialist. Penn has been drinking the Chavez “Kool-Aid” by the gallons.

Useful idiots like Sean Penn would point to Hugo Chavez and describe him as an “elected” president. While Chavez may have started out as an elected president, soon after being inaugurated (in 1999) a new constitution was “approved” that, just so happened, to include an increase to the presidential term years, and expanded powers.

It didn’t take long for “common sense” thinking Venezuelans to see what was happening to their country. There was a 2003 referendum to recall Chavez. Even though 3.2 million signature were presented in August, the National Electoral Council rejected them. In the end, the recall was “defeated”.

In 2009 Chavez “won a referendum” to eliminate term limits- he can govern indefinitely. The Organization of American States (OAS), who in 2006, gave their “blessing”  to the results of the 2006 election, released a report in 2010 that expresses concerns over freedom of expression, freedom of press, authoritariansim, and human rights abuses. Put these with their concerns with political intimidation and the erosion of separation of powers- we get a real picture of a dictator in the purest form.

You know, it’s kind of ironic. Here we have Sean Penn, the “official celebrity groupie” to the dictators calling for journalists to be imprisoned for daring to describe Hugo Chavez as a dictator. One might even get the idea that Sean Penn would agree with Chavez and the Castros for imprisoning journalists and political prisoners.

I guess it is really true what they say- show me your friends and I’ll show you your future. Mr. Penn- I’ll hand it to you, you really do live what you preach. I’m just glad your a washed up actor with an anger management problem rather then a…what’s that word- dictator! (wink, wink)

Did anyone notice the purple neck tie?

Obama’s props- doctors and white coats

Does Barack Obama have a closet full of white lab coats? My doctor always leaves his white coat in his office. In fact, I don’t believe I ever see doctors out in public wearing their lab coats. Wait a minute…unless these “doctors” are not really doctors. Could they be, dare I say, “rent-a-docs”? Hmmmm…

Eric Boehlert and Media Matters: Willful Ignorance is bliss…

Willful:
1
: obstinately and often perversely self-willed <a stubborn and willful child>
2 : done deliberately : intentional <willful disobedience>

Ignorance
1. the state or fact of being ignorant : lack of knowledge, education, or awareness

The definitions above fit Eric Boehlert and his Media Matters team. Ignorance in itself can be innocent- we saw it in the millions who voted for “Hope and Change” in the past Presidential election. But then there is another kind of ignorance- the type of ignorance which leads everyone from tyrants to those who follow them. And no, Eric Boehlert isn’t a tyrant (though he may fantasize about it during his afternoon breaks from his Fox News critiques).

Eric Boehlert, Media Matters- thank you for all of your pathetic musings…well, kind of.

Irony: Alan Grayson rescued by Blackwater

An image associated with the word “irony” is Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla) being rescued by the military contractors Xe Services, formely known as Blackwater.

For those not familiar with Grayson’s relationship to Blackwater, he was the congressman who went after, and sued, military contractors. Blackwater, now named Xe Services, was one of those contractors.

During a Senate hearing on government oversight of security contractors, Alan Grayson’s “little airlift” out of a violent military coup in Niger was the topic of discussion. Xe Services executive vice president Fred Roitz reminded members in the Senate hearing that his company, via its subsidiary Presidential Airways, rescued Rep. Alan Grayson from a deadly situation.

The 2,400 Page “prop”

Today we are reminded of the arrogance of the man sitting in the Oval Office.

There are two things that Barrack Obama can’t handle:

1. Being told, “No.”

2. Criticism

At the “health show summit” today, President Obama looked like a kid who showed up for a pop quiz without studying any of the material. There was a moment when Obama displayed his arrogant ignorance when he accused Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) of bringing a political “prop” to the table, calling it a stunt that will get in the way of serious conversation.

That “prop” was the 2,400 page Senate bill, along with the 11 page proposal that Obama posted on the web this week. The irony here is that the “prop”, the bill itself, is what is the main topic of discussion today.

Democrats have been bringing props to the table all day- letters from individuals to manipulate the emotional response of the media. But what’s new.

More to come after the “show” is over…

Some Republicans prove Glenn Beck’s CPAC speech right…

Who does the GOP see when they look in the mirror?

On Monday we heard Republican pundits ranting against Glenn Beck for his speech at CPAC. Beck’s “wake up call” speech hit a chord with people…and most of them were on the right.

Beck didn’t speak at CPAC to tell everyone what they already know. It seems like there are a lot of Republicans who need to step back and remember what CPAC stands for-  Conservative Political Action Conference. The key word there is “Conservative”.

He came to CPAC to remind the GOP who they work for. Sure, there are members of the Republican Party doing the right thing, and Beck gives them credit every other day on this programs. But Beck was shining the light on the cancer that is has been eating away at the Republican Party. If termites were infesting your home, you wouldn’t ignore the problem- you would remove the problem. And that is what Beck’s CPAC speech focused on- remind the GOP of what Conservatism means.

So this week, days after CPAC, we see Republicans doing exactly what Beck warned against- they’re not acting like conservatives! We have Republicans supporting the Progressive agenda- either directly or indirectly.

We have the Republican “Boy Wonder” Scott Brown come out and decide to support Obama’s latest bailout, I mean “Jobs Bill”. I know Brown is from Massachussetts, but for the love of all things not Progressive, this isn’t a very good start- only days after CPAC!

This “Jobs Bill” does very little in the long run for employment in America. But its a like a Progressive “ice cream sundae”- it looks good, tastes good, but has little nutritious value. Its the type of bill that a Republican would support when they want positive media from the New York Times and Washington Post.

Other Republicans who supported the bill are Maine’s Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe (no suprise), George Voinovich(Ohio), and Christopher Bond(Mo).

And then we have Mitt Romney, the man who many Republicans were looking to as a possible presidential candidate…he’s campaigning for progressive Republican John McCain- the “big tent” guy. It’s obviously a “I’ll scratch your back if you…” moment.

While these Republicans are not necessarily representitive of the whole party, it goes to prove that we don’t really know who these people are. They certainly are not acting like conservatives. So, only days after Glenn Beck’s CPAC speech, we are witnessing Republicans not walking the walk.

G.O.P.: Stepping out of denial is uncomfortable, but necessary

“We admitted we were powerless over our addiction of spending – that our lives had become unmanageable” (Step One of the 12 Steps)

We know the majority of Democrats, and all liberals, are addicted to spending and big government. Pointing more fingers in that direction is like the guy who gets high on weekends saying, “Just because I blow half my paycheck on cocaine once a week doesn’t make me an addict”.

For most of the last century, there have been too many Republicans who have become addicted to spending as well. Have you heard about those Progressives lately? What does Barack Obama, Meghan McCain, Charlie Crist, Lindsey Graham,  Theodore Roosevelt, and Hillary Clinton have in common? They all either tag themselves with being “Progressive” or hold onto the Progressive ideals that date back to the early 20th Century. Yes, there are the Progressive Republicans- they even have their own place on the web.

The G.O.P. have become known as “the party of no” to the Obama Administration, so they’re obviously on the right track. But they haven’t always been fiscally sane. While liberals have always been big spenders, and creators of bigger government, Republicans haven’t quite been the poster child for sane spending.

Glenn Beck gave the final speech at CPAC this past weekend to a roaring exited crowd. He said what millions of Republicans, and Americans in general, have been thinking. He shook things up, and there are always those who don’t like it when you “rock the boat”.

Conservative pundit, politician, and radio personality Bill Bennett didn’t like the fact that Beck compared reckless spending to an alcoholic in denial. Glenn is a recovering alcoholic himself, so he knows something about denial. But it obviously rubbed Mr. Bennett the wrong way. He wrote in a National Review Online editorial, “Glenn has made that mistake here and taken to our politics a cosmologizing of his own deficiencies. This is not a baseless criticism; they are his own deficiencies that he keeps publicly redounding to and analogizing to. It is wrong and he is wrong.”

Bill Bennett is, unintentionally, making Beck’s point- that Republicans have been in denial. It’s obvious that Mr. Bennett has been living in denial by his reaction to the speech. Mr. Bennett can keep pointing fingers at the Democrats all day long, but if we don’t clean our own “house” and acknowledge and learn from our history- then we will continue to make those mistakes. Republicans have been standing up to the leftwing agenda in Washington, and that is good. But it hasn’t always been that way- and that’s the point Beck was making with his speech. We need to continue to remember history so that we do not make the same mistakes.
The rest of Bill Bennett’s article actually sounds like a defensive alcoholic who can’t admit that there has been a problem in the first place. The purpose of Glenn Beck’s CPAC speech was to acknowledge that America has, for too long been evolving into something that is far from what our country was founded on. And far too many Republicans have become part of that problem- the truth does hurt.

Bennett ends his article by stating that, “The first task of a serious political analyst is to see things as they are…there is a difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. To ignore these differences, or propagate the myth that they don’t exist, is not only discouraging, it is dangerous.”

Is there a difference between Democrats and Republicans? Sure there are. But when we see some of the ear marks in years past, spending programs, and even the list of czars in the Bush administration (35!), it is difficult for many of us to pretend everything has been “fine and dandy”.

Glenn Beck knows that there are differences when you get down to the details. But when we step back and look at the big picture we see a big “tennis match” going on. When we have the G.O.P. putting liberal Republican candidates like Dede Scozzafava in place, it makes us question the G.O.P. When we hear Republicans such as Lindsey Graham talk about carbon taxing, it makes us question the G.O.P. It is ok and proper to question our leaders.

There will always be those who will resist looking in the mirror and acknowledging the problem. But once we acknowledge the problem, and step out of denial- we can move forward. We the People have been moving forward this past year.

It wasn’t the “G.O.P. Tea Party”, or the “Republican sponsored 9/12 March”, or even the “Town hall meeting protest for the G.O.P.). These events, protests, and moments where Americans standing up. While many protesters were Republicans, there were many who were at the other end of the protest who were Republicans. This is why Glenn Beck’s speech at CPAC was so important. Beck’s speech was a reminder to the American people, and , to the Republicans that there is a “cancer” that is just waiting to engulf our nation- and it can live in either political party.

Glenn Beck @ CPAC: Speech of the decade

Max Blumenthal: Brat, punk, hack- any questions?

Remember that brat in grade school who knew it all? Of course, he didn’t know it all, but in his little world, he was the all knowing barer of knowledge.

He was the kid who would make snide comments to the biggest kid in the class every day,  but would have his parents call in the police when he finally got punched in the nose.

This pathetic child would tell his daddy that the phys-ed teacher abused him after running the mile. Because the brat’s father was a local lawyer with lots of connections to the school board, the gym teacher got transfered.

Do you remember this kid? His name could have been Max Blumenthal. His daddy was a big time journalist and even worked for Bill Clinton. Little Max had a job on a silver platter waiting for him- anywhere.

Max Blumenthal is a brat. Max Blumenthal is a punk kid who wouldn’t even be working for a local free newspaper if it wasn’t for his daddy. We know it, he knows it, everybody knows it.

Little Max thought he could get away with hack journalism. And he did get away with it- for a while. The “brat” finally got his “bloody nose” via a guy named Andrew Breitbart- and the classroom cheered.

RSS for Posts RSS for Comments